| |
Inadequate
and incomplete - continence care in the UK
The first national audit of incontinence care for older people in
the UK shows widespread failure to diagnose and manage continence
problems. The audit, undertaken by the Royal College of Physician’s
Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit and commissioned by the
Healthcare Commission, examined the quality of care for older people
with urinary and faecal incontinence in primary care, secondary
care and care homes in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The audit was based on the standards set in the National Service
Framework for Older People [2001] and the Department of Health guidance
“Good practice in continence services”[2000] and recorded
the care of over 9,000 patients and 700 care home residents. Data
were returned by 159 Trusts covering 195 hospitals, 141 Primary
Care Trusts and 29 care homes.
Urinary incontinence affects some 24% of older people and 30-60%
of people in institutional care. Faecal incontinence occurs in approximately
1-4% of adults and up to 25% of people in institutional care. Both
cause much distress and loss of dignity for the older person.
Effective management of continence depends on a thorough assessment
of the patient leading to a diagnosis. The audit found that although
specialist NHS staff had good continence knowledge, patients were
often not examined thoroughly or given routine assessments. Even
where this had been carried out effectively, there was no guarantee
that the underlying diagnosis would be found and treated –
for most patients only the symptoms are managed, when in some cases
there could be a cure. In addition, the audit found a lack of written
policies, missing documentation, limited provision of staff training,
high use of indwelling catheters in hospital settings and widespread
rationing of continence pads.
The National Service Framework for Older People set the requirement
that service providers should establish integrated continence services
by April 2004. However, the audit indicates that there has been
only limited action toward this and that provision of services remains
extremely variable. The findings of the audit include:
Only 59% of primary and 32% of secondary care sites have a written
policy which covers continence care for older people
Nearly all sites ask a screening question relating to bladder and
bowel care, but only 64% of primary and 44% of secondary sites have
a protocol for providing basic assessment to patients
Integrated continence services are only present in 53/138 of primary
care and 50/195 secondary care sites, and in 10 out of 27 care homes
taking part in the audit. On further inspection, many of the services
said to be integrated were missing vital elements
Only 49% of secondary care trusts offer structured training on the
management of continence to their staff
Despite about 80% of services having a written policy that pads
should be available on the basis of clinical need, 81% of primary
care and 76% of care home services limit the maximum number of daily
pads for patients
60% of primary and 70% of secondary care patients with bladder or
bowel problems received pads as a way of managing their condition,
rather than treating the underlying problem
Less than half of patients, where it was appropriate to do so, had
a documented explanation of their condition and treatment
Inadequate assessment of incontinence with an emphasis on containment
rather than cure is expensive, from both a financial and health
perspective. In the face of the great daily cost of containing continence,
the audit indicates a missed opportunity to assess, treat and reduce
the numbers of incontinent people. We feel that this audit represents
a significant step in raising the profile of continence and contributing
to the improvement in the quality of care for older people with
bladder and bowel problems.
Dr Adrian Wagg, Chairman of the Continence Working Party, said:
“This is probably the largest audit on continence care world
wide and we are extremely grateful to everyone who has participated.
It shows that care for people with continence problems is patchy
at best, that a cure is seldom attempted and that the single mandatory
target for continence in the NSF has not been met. There is a wealth
of opportunity for improvement, something that we will be attempting
to encourage over the coming months”
National Audit of Continence Care for Older People
|
|